TL;DR
Get oils, diffusers and self-care delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
A Fit&Well report describes a floor-to-standing fitness test associated with mobility, balance and strength, and cites research linking lower scores to higher mortality. That association does not mean difficulty rising predicts an individual’s health outcome; coach Yancy Culp recommends practicing a knee-roll drill to work on mobility.
A Fit&Well report has highlighted a test in which a person sits on the floor and tries to stand without using their hands, after the article’s writer said they could not complete it unaided. The test can prompt people to consider their mobility, balance and strength, but research cited in the report found an association between lower scores and mortality—not proof that an individual’s result predicts their lifespan.
The test is a variation of the sitting-rising test, which Brazilian researchers developed in the 1990s to assess muscular strength and flexibility. Fit&Well included it among five basic fitness checks associated with coach Yancy Culp, co-creator of Spartan DEKA and a senior director. The other checks ask whether a person can balance on one leg while doing a task, hold a plank for 30 seconds, perform two reverse lunges and walk briskly for 20 minutes.
The report’s writer said they failed the floor-to-standing test, describing an unsuccessful attempt to rise without help. Culp told the writer that improving hip and overall mobility may help with the movement. He suggested a daily drill called knee rolls: sit with the knees and lower legs on the ground, move both knees from one side to the other while keeping the feet in contact with the floor, and repeat for 20 reps.
Culp said people may use their hands for stability while learning the drill, though he suggested keeping them raised if possible. He also advised leaning forward at the end of each roll toward the leg positioned in front. The report gives this as coaching advice; it does not establish that the drill is suitable for everyone or that it will produce a particular health outcome.
A Functional Check, Not a Diagnosis
Getting up from the floor draws on several physical abilities at once, so difficulty can be a useful reason to pay attention to how movement feels. The test is not a diagnosis, however, and a single attempt cannot establish why someone struggled or what their overall health is like. Age, injury, pain, fatigue, body proportions and familiarity with the movement may all affect performance; the source report does not assess those factors for its writer.
The report cites a 2014 study in the European Journal of Preventive Cardiology that found an association between lower sitting-rising test scores and higher mortality rates. An association in a study is not proof that a low score causes an early death, nor does it determine an individual’s prognosis. Readers should treat the finding as population-level research, not a reason to draw conclusions about their own lifespan from a home fitness check.
The practical value is more limited and more immediate: the movement can expose a challenge with rising from the ground, a task relevant to everyday independence. If the attempt causes pain, dizziness or instability, it is sensible to stop rather than force the movement. People with health concerns or a history of falls can ask a qualified health professional for guidance before trying exercises.
How the Test Fits the Report
Fit&Well presented the floor-rise challenge as one of five checks intended to help people “check in with their body and understand whether it’s still doing the basics well,” according to the article’s account of Culp’s approach. The checks span balance, lower-body movement, core endurance and walking capacity, rather than measuring one single aspect of fitness.
The floor-rise movement is related to the sitting-rising test developed by Brazilian researchers in the 1990s to assess muscular strength and flexibility. The report refers to the 2014 study as evidence of an association between test scores and mortality, but does not provide the study’s sample size, score thresholds, effect estimates or details of how other health factors were handled. Those omissions limit how much readers can infer from the brief description.
The article is a fitness report, not a new clinical guideline or a newly published research announcement. Its central development is the writer’s account of trying the test and Culp’s response with a suggested drill. The underlying research finding dates to 2014, rather than representing a fresh study result.
“Improving hip and overall mobility is very important for this one.”
— Yancy Culp, as quoted in the Fit&Well report
Limits of the Evidence and Advice
The report does not give enough detail about the 2014 study to explain how large the association was, which participants were included or how strongly the results apply to different age groups and health conditions. It also does not show that inability to rise without hands independently predicts mortality for a particular person. The result should not be read as a personal risk estimate.
There is no information in the source about how the five checks were validated as a combined assessment, or whether the knee-roll drill has been studied for improving test scores. Culp’s suggestion is attributed coaching advice, not a guarantee of improvement. The report also does not specify adaptations for people with pain, limited mobility or balance concerns.
Use the Test With Care
The report’s practical suggestion is to try Culp’s knee rolls, gradually and with support if needed, and to repeat the movement over time rather than treating one attempt as a definitive result. The source gives a target of 20 repetitions each day, but people should stop if the drill causes pain or feels unsafe. Anyone with a medical condition, recent injury, or a history of falls should seek professional advice before starting it.
No follow-up study, clinical assessment or formal change to fitness guidance is announced in the report. For now, the test is best understood as a simple movement check, while the cited mortality finding remains an association from earlier research. More information about the study’s methods and the drill’s effectiveness would be needed to draw stronger conclusions.
Key Questions
What does the floor-to-standing test involve?
It asks a person to sit on the floor and stand back up without using their hands. It is a variation of the sitting-rising test, which was developed to assess strength and flexibility.
Does failing the test mean a person is at risk of dying sooner?
No individual conclusion follows from one attempt. The report cites a 2014 study that found an association between lower scores and higher mortality, but an association does not prove cause and effect or predict a specific person’s outcome.
What exercise did Yancy Culp suggest?
Culp suggested knee rolls: while seated with the lower legs on the floor, move both knees from side to side while keeping the feet in contact with the ground. He recommended 20 repetitions and said hands can be used for stability if needed.
Should someone keep trying if they cannot get up?
No one should force the movement through pain, dizziness or a feeling of instability. People with injuries, health conditions or fall concerns should ask a qualified health professional for advice before attempting the test or drill.
Source: rss
Evergreen bestsellers Picks
bestsellers
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
